• Mark Ryan

A Great WOTUS Mapping Tool

St. Mary's University recently put together a GIS mapping database to look at how different WOTUS definitions would increase or decrease CWA jurisdiction over wetlands. (I was on the advisory committee for the effort.) They looked at three watersheds in three states and considered three scenarios: less restrictive, very restrictive and most restrictive. Very roughly speaking, "less restrictive" approximates the 2015 rule and "very restrictive" is close to the new rule just promulgated. As you advance though the slides in the link below, you can see many wetlands are taken out of jurisdiction by comparing the different scenarios. Impacts are much greater in the arid west. It's a nice tool to visually grasp the impacts of the different policy approaches to wetland protection. The model they created can be adapted to other watersheds if the data are available.

46 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

A Special Treat

In my April 12 blogpost, I explained that I would be retiring soon, and with retirement I would be retiring the CWA Blog at the end of May. In that post, I referenced a special treat for my readers. A

Six New Cases

We have three Circuit Court cases this round, which is unusual. None are earth-shaking, but the Rio Hondo case is worth a read if TMDL/anti-backsliding/WQ permit limits are your thing. The Center for

Enviro Groups Sue the Corps Over Pipelines

A number of environmental groups have sued the Corps over NWP 12, alleging that the modifications to the NWP failed to properly analyze environmental impacts of pipelines. The NWP modifications pushed