• Mark Ryan

A Mistake in the 11th Cir. Opinion?

Three days ago, I blogged about the "Interesting New Criminal WOTUS Case." That case, United States v. Coleman, 2020 WL 7244923 (11th Cir. 2020) (unpublished), contains a mistake regarding WOTUS in the final paragraph that I originally missed. I've quoted the language below. Can you spot the mistake?

Finally, entering a judgment without an adequate factual basis “seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” Olano, 507 U.S. at 736, 113 S. Ct. at 1779 (quotation marks omitted and alteration adopted). Rule 11’s requirement of a sufficient factual basis is to ensure that a factually innocent defendant does not mistakenly plead guilty. Lopez, 907 F.2d at 1100. The record does not provide the assurance that the fuel on the ground significantly affected the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Ochlocknee River. Therefore, we vacate Coleman's conviction and sentence, and remand to the district court for further proceedings.

If you would like to receive email notifications of new blogposts, go to the signup button above, leave your email, and you'll be alerted to updates.

32 views1 comment

Recent Posts

See All

New 2020 WOTUS Rule Challenge Filed

Two New Mexico tribes filed a new challenge to the 2020 WOTUS rule in the D. of New Mexico on March 29. This complaint sets itself apart from many of the others in that it asserts a failure to abide b

The CWA Blog is Retiring in June

Thirty-three years of practicing law is enough, and I'm retiring this year. Unfortunately, that also means the end of the CWA Blog. I've decided, after careful consideration, to send the Blog off into

Sackett Update

You will recall that the latest chapter of the long Sackett saga is that EPA filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot given that the old WOTUS rule, which is the basis of the Sackett challenge, is

© 2016 by Ryan & Kuehler PLLC.

  • Facebook Basic Black
  • LinkedIn Basic Black
  • Twitter Basic Black