• Mark Ryan

A New OPA Cost-Recovery Case

This new case from the Second Circuit was a close-call statutory interpretation case that involved what appears to be some very good lawyering on both sides, and shows how broadly courts tend to construe environmental statutes.

Power Authority v. M/V Ellen S. Bouchard, ___ F. 3d ___, 2020 WL 4355268 (2nd Cir. 2020) (reversing district court in action by cable owner to recover response costs, held that undersea cable containing dielectric fluid that was ruptured by a ship’s anchor is a “facility” that is “used for” one of the enumerated purposes in OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(9))

If you would like to receive email notifications of new blogposts, go to the signup button above, leave your email, and you'll be alerted to updates.

22 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

A Special Treat

In my April 12 blogpost, I explained that I would be retiring soon, and with retirement I would be retiring the CWA Blog at the end of May. In that post, I referenced a special treat for my readers. A

Six New Cases

We have three Circuit Court cases this round, which is unusual. None are earth-shaking, but the Rio Hondo case is worth a read if TMDL/anti-backsliding/WQ permit limits are your thing. The Center for

Enviro Groups Sue the Corps Over Pipelines

A number of environmental groups have sued the Corps over NWP 12, alleging that the modifications to the NWP failed to properly analyze environmental impacts of pipelines. The NWP modifications pushed