• Mark Ryan

A New WQS Case

Motions for reconsideration may make the lawyer on the losing side feel better, but they seldom succeed. Judges rarely reverse themselves. This one did.

Riverkeeper, Inc. v. EPA, 2020 WL 1188455 (S.D.N.Y. 2030) (on motion for reconsideration in action against EPA for failure under 303(c) to exercise nondiscretionary duty and undue delay in promulgating wqs in NY for water-borne pathogens, held that prior opinion did not address the APA claim which plaintiff had raised; plaintiff is granted permission to amend complaint to further explain APA claim)

29 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

New 2020 WOTUS Rule Challenge Filed

Two New Mexico tribes filed a new challenge to the 2020 WOTUS rule in the D. of New Mexico on March 29. This complaint sets itself apart from many of the others in that it asserts a failure to abide b

The CWA Blog is Retiring in June

Thirty-three years of practicing law is enough, and I'm retiring this year. Unfortunately, that also means the end of the CWA Blog. I've decided, after careful consideration, to send the Blog off into

Sackett Update

You will recall that the latest chapter of the long Sackett saga is that EPA filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot given that the old WOTUS rule, which is the basis of the Sackett challenge, is

© 2016 by Ryan & Kuehler PLLC.

  • Facebook Basic Black
  • LinkedIn Basic Black
  • Twitter Basic Black