• Mark Ryan

A New WQS Case

Motions for reconsideration may make the lawyer on the losing side feel better, but they seldom succeed. Judges rarely reverse themselves. This one did.

Riverkeeper, Inc. v. EPA, 2020 WL 1188455 (S.D.N.Y. 2030) (on motion for reconsideration in action against EPA for failure under 303(c) to exercise nondiscretionary duty and undue delay in promulgating wqs in NY for water-borne pathogens, held that prior opinion did not address the APA claim which plaintiff had raised; plaintiff is granted permission to amend complaint to further explain APA claim)

29 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Quick Presidential Action on WOTUS

As expect, the ship is turning directions under the new Biden administration. In one of his first executive orders entitled "Executive Order on Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restori

New Fifth Circuit Decision

The case below follows a long line of 505(b)/309(g)(6) cases addressing whether the state law is similar enough to the CWA to provide a bar to federal court prosecution. The courts have frequently rea

Dave Ross Interview in E&E

All of us who work in the CWA know the name Dave Ross. He headed up the EPA Office of Water under the Trump administration. Regardless of what you think of the work he did, he was by any measure produ

© 2016 by Ryan & Kuehler PLLC.

  • Facebook Basic Black
  • LinkedIn Basic Black
  • Twitter Basic Black