• Mark Ryan

California Court Overturns EPA JD on San Francisco Salt Ponds

The N.D. of California yesterday overturned a 2019 EPA JD that found the Carghill Salt Ponds in San Francisco to be not covered by the CWA because they were "fast lands." The 2015 WOTUS rule was in effect at the time the JD was issued, but EPA skirted the WOTUS rule entirely by concluding that the ponds were "fast lands" in 1972 when the CWA was passed, and were therefore not jurisdictional. A leaked EPA Reg. 9 memo from the Obama administration had reached the opposite conclusion. Enviro groups challenged the JD under the APA.

The court concluded that EPA had misinterpreted prior 9th Cir. case law when it reached the conclusion that the ponds, which hold water and have important connections to the Bay, were nonjurisdictional uplands. Because the land at issue would, absent the installed dikes, have been subject to tidal inundation in 1972, they are covered by the CWA.

It will be interesting to see if EPA now attempts to find the ponds nonjurisdictional under the 2020 WOTUS rule. These ponds are arguably an impoundment of a jurisdictional water (S.F. Bay), so arguably are covered under the 2020 rule. See 33 C.F.R. 328.3(a)(3). Adjacent waters are not covered, only adjacent wetlands, and these ponds probably are not wetlands owing to the lack of hydrophytic vegetation. Otherwise, they might fit even the current definition of adjacency. See 33 C.F.R. 328.3(c)(1). Land under these ponds is unbelievably valuable if it can be built upon, so the owner will likely continue to press its case in the courts and with the EPA.

Here's a copy of the decision.

Alsup Order re Cross Motions for Summary
Download • 96KB

If you would like to receive email notifications of new blogposts, go to the signup button above, leave your email, and you'll be alerted to updates.

35 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

New 2020 WOTUS Rule Challenge Filed

Two New Mexico tribes filed a new challenge to the 2020 WOTUS rule in the D. of New Mexico on March 29. This complaint sets itself apart from many of the others in that it asserts a failure to abide b

The CWA Blog is Retiring in June

Thirty-three years of practicing law is enough, and I'm retiring this year. Unfortunately, that also means the end of the CWA Blog. I've decided, after careful consideration, to send the Blog off into

Sackett Update

You will recall that the latest chapter of the long Sackett saga is that EPA filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot given that the old WOTUS rule, which is the basis of the Sackett challenge, is

© 2016 by Ryan & Kuehler PLLC.

  • Facebook Basic Black
  • LinkedIn Basic Black
  • Twitter Basic Black