• Mark Ryan

EPA Appeals the Colorado WOTUS Stay

EPA filed a notice of appeal with the 10th Cir. yesterday, appealing the Dist. of Colorado decision staying the 2020 WOTUS rule in Colorado. (See my June 22 Blogpost for more on that decision.) The judge ruled that Rapanos foreclosed the new rule based on the plurality opinion in Rapanos. EPA argues that it is free to reinterpret the CWA's definition of WOTUS and nothing in Rapanos says they can't. I think five justices of the Supreme Court clearly rejected Scalia's RPW test in Rapanos, and that's the law until SCOTUS revisits the issue. But the 10th Cir. may disagree with me. I suspect the plaintiffs in the N.D. Cal. case will appeal to the 9th Cir. Stay tuned.

If you would like to receive email notifications of new blogposts, go to the signup button above, leave your email, and you'll be alerted to updates.

34 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Waterkeeper Files NOI in Coal Ash Case

Waterkeeper last week served the NOI below on Ameren Corp, which is an electric utility in Missouri. The NOI alleges that Ameren is discharging without a permit wastewater from coal ash ponds into the

Two New (Oddball) CWA Cases

These two cases bring up issues one seldom sees in the case law, which makes them mildly interesting. Reading the clever arguments raised by defendants in the Earth Island case below reminded me of my

A Modest Proposal to Fix WOTUS

As I have argued numerous times in the past, Congress needs to fix the WOTUS problem. They created it by so vaguely defining “navigable waters,” and only they can permanently fix the problem (assuming

© 2016 by Ryan & Kuehler PLLC.

  • Facebook Basic Black
  • LinkedIn Basic Black
  • Twitter Basic Black