• Mark Ryan

EPA Finalizes the Maui Guidance

EPA quietly finalized the Maui Guidance this past week. I suspect the outgoing EPA administration was just too busy finalizing last-minute rules, policies and guidances to do more than the minimum. They're moving mountains as they head for the exit. A copy of the final is attached below.

I have not yet had a chance to read it in detail, but I understand that little has changed from the draft EPA released on Dec. 8 and which was published in the Fed. Reg. on December 10 with public comments due of Jan. 11. Here's a link to that notice.

The Dec. 10 Fed. Reg. notice received 4,475 comments, which is a lot for a proposed guidance. Here's a link:

The final was guidance was released on Jan. 13, just two days after the end of the public comment period. It's hard to believe EPA wrote in two days meaningful response to comments on 4,475 comments. As I wrote in my Dec. 8 blogpost, this guidance was thrown together in a hurry likely with little to no career staff input, and it shows in the sloppy reasoning that is, at times, inconsistent with the SCOTUS Maui decision. It will be interesting to see what the Biden administration does with it. Under the new guidance rule that EPA put out last year, the document can no long simply be retracted, so EPA will either have to go through public notice and comment rulemaking to withdraw it, or wait to get sued and take a voluntary remand. The folks in the Ariel Rios Building are going to be busy for awhile as they deal with this avalanche of last-minute rulemakings, not to mention the WOTUS rule, the 401 cert. rule . . . ..

The final Maui guidance is scheduled to be published in the Fed. Reg. on Jan. 21, 2021. Here's a link to the notice of availability of guidance:

Maui Guidance 1.14.21 final
Download PDF • 254KB

If you would like to receive email notifications of new blogposts, go to the signup button above, leave your email, and you'll be alerted to updates.

30 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Waterkeeper Files NOI in Coal Ash Case

Waterkeeper last week served the NOI below on Ameren Corp, which is an electric utility in Missouri. The NOI alleges that Ameren is discharging without a permit wastewater from coal ash ponds into the

Two New (Oddball) CWA Cases

These two cases bring up issues one seldom sees in the case law, which makes them mildly interesting. Reading the clever arguments raised by defendants in the Earth Island case below reminded me of my

A Modest Proposal to Fix WOTUS

As I have argued numerous times in the past, Congress needs to fix the WOTUS problem. They created it by so vaguely defining “navigable waters,” and only they can permanently fix the problem (assuming

© 2016 by Ryan & Kuehler PLLC.

  • Facebook Basic Black
  • LinkedIn Basic Black
  • Twitter Basic Black