• Mark Ryan

Idaho Considers Water Quality Trading

EPA recently approved Idaho as the 47th state to run its NPDES permit program. The state still has to comply with a recent 9th Cir. order to fix its criminal mens rea problem to cement in the program authorization (see my Sept. 13 blogpost). But assuming that happens, according to the article below from the Capital Press, Idaho is moving quickly to make it easier to set up water quality trading. Idaho is a big ag state with huge ag impacts to water quality, especially from nutrients. Because almost all of those ag discharges are nonpoint source and not regulated under the CWA, there's great potential to do trades.

As I've written in the past (see attached article below), effluent trading can be a good thing if done correctly. It appears that Idaho is only in the earliest stages of considering the move, and it remains to be seen how the program will be set up and administered. I helped negotiate one of the first trades in the country when I was at EPA, and it's not an easy task. The CWA is not set up to allow trading. So it will be interesting to see how Idaho proposes to set up trading in a way that complies with the act and avoids the ire of the environmental groups, who will certainly be watching.

Ryan - Effluent Trading article 2018
Download PDF • 79KB

If you would like to receive email notifications of new blogposts, go to the signup button above, leave your email, and you'll be alerted to updates.

27 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

A Special Treat

In my April 12 blogpost, I explained that I would be retiring soon, and with retirement I would be retiring the CWA Blog at the end of May. In that post, I referenced a special treat for my readers. A

Six New Cases

We have three Circuit Court cases this round, which is unusual. None are earth-shaking, but the Rio Hondo case is worth a read if TMDL/anti-backsliding/WQ permit limits are your thing. The Center for

Enviro Groups Sue the Corps Over Pipelines

A number of environmental groups have sued the Corps over NWP 12, alleging that the modifications to the NWP failed to properly analyze environmental impacts of pipelines. The NWP modifications pushed