Search
  • Mark Ryan

New Article in Science Magazine Questions 2020 WOTUS Rule

The article below, "Distorting science, putting water at risk" by S. Mazeika Patricio Sullivan, Mark C. Rains, Amanda D. Rodewald, William W. Buzbee and Amy D. Rosemond, which just published in Science Magazine questions the science used by the EPA and the Corps in developing the 2020 WOTUS rule. This short, 3-page article succinctly summarizes the major scientific concepts and the findings of the Obama administration that were either short-changed or ignored in the promulgation of the 2020 Rule. (Yes, I'm biased on this topic. I was part of the internal peer review of the science report for EPA in connection with the 2015 rule.) The 2020 rule is now final, but this article from one of the leading science journals in the U.S. will likely be cited in the on-going litigation over the rule and it will give greater impetus to changes in the new administration, if we have one.


Here's a link to the article:

Science article on WOTUS 8.14.20
.pdf
Download PDF • 3.28MB

If you would like to receive email notifications of new blogposts, go to the signup button above, leave your email, and you'll be alerted to updates.

35 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

New 2020 WOTUS Rule Challenge Filed

Two New Mexico tribes filed a new challenge to the 2020 WOTUS rule in the D. of New Mexico on March 29. This complaint sets itself apart from many of the others in that it asserts a failure to abide b

The CWA Blog is Retiring in June

Thirty-three years of practicing law is enough, and I'm retiring this year. Unfortunately, that also means the end of the CWA Blog. I've decided, after careful consideration, to send the Blog off into

Sackett Update

You will recall that the latest chapter of the long Sackett saga is that EPA filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot given that the old WOTUS rule, which is the basis of the Sackett challenge, is

© 2016 by Ryan & Kuehler PLLC.

  • Facebook Basic Black
  • LinkedIn Basic Black
  • Twitter Basic Black