• Mark Ryan

New Fifth Circuit Decision

The case below follows a long line of 505(b)/309(g)(6) cases addressing whether the state law is similar enough to the CWA to provide a bar to federal court prosecution. The courts have frequently reached the same conclusion as the 5th Circuit does here, that the state law is not comparable. If you're a defense attorney, and you think the deal you're working out with the state is protecting you, do your homework.

Stringer v. Town of Jonesboro, ___ F.3d ___, 2021 WL 150735 (5th Cir. 2021) (reversing district court in case alleging unauthorized sewage overflows onto plaintiff’s property and into local creeks, held that prior state action did not bar the present action under 309(g)(6)(A)(ii) because the state health department’s enforcement of sanitary code is not comparable to the CWA; where the state code lacked notice and public participation, it did not “provide[] interested citizens a meaningful opportunity to participate at significant stages of the decision-making process”)

If you would like to receive email notifications of new blogposts, go to the signup button above, leave your email, and you'll be alerted to updates.

24 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Waterkeeper Files NOI in Coal Ash Case

Waterkeeper last week served the NOI below on Ameren Corp, which is an electric utility in Missouri. The NOI alleges that Ameren is discharging without a permit wastewater from coal ash ponds into the

Two New (Oddball) CWA Cases

These two cases bring up issues one seldom sees in the case law, which makes them mildly interesting. Reading the clever arguments raised by defendants in the Earth Island case below reminded me of my

A Modest Proposal to Fix WOTUS

As I have argued numerous times in the past, Congress needs to fix the WOTUS problem. They created it by so vaguely defining “navigable waters,” and only they can permanently fix the problem (assuming

© 2016 by Ryan & Kuehler PLLC.

  • Facebook Basic Black
  • LinkedIn Basic Black
  • Twitter Basic Black