Search
  • Mark Ryan

Sacketts File Their 9th Cir. Reply Brief

The Sacketts today filed their reply brief in their 9th Cir. appeal of their loss in the D. Idaho case challenging the EPA 309(a) enforcement order. The lower court ruled that EPA was not arbitrary and capricious in issuing the order because the wetland on the Sackett's property was jurisdictional under the 2008 Guidance, which was in effect at the time EPA issued the order. (See my June 24, May 22, April 16, April 9, and March 30 blogposts for more on the Sackett case.)


The Sacketts are now arguing that the Rapanos plurality decision dictates that the court find the wetland to be nonjurisdictional. Because the 9th Cir. has already twice rejected the plurality opinion in favor of the Kennedy significant nexus standard, that's not likely going to happen, and I suspect the PLF knows that. They're hoping to get to the Supreme Court.


Also at issue is mootness. EPA is arguing that the case is moot because the agency withdrew the order early this year. PLF argues the case is not moot because the JD finding the site to be jurisdictional is still out there and theoretically enforceable. Unfortunately, there is no JD. I worked on the Sackett case while at EPA, and neither the Corps nor EPA ever issued a JD for the site. It'll be interesting to see if the Court adopts PLF's argument that the EPA inspection report concluding that the site is jurisdictional is the functional equivalent of a JD. I doubt it.



If you would like to receive email notifications of new blogposts, go to the signup button above, leave your email, and you'll be alerted to updates.

22 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

New 2020 WOTUS Rule Challenge Filed

Two New Mexico tribes filed a new challenge to the 2020 WOTUS rule in the D. of New Mexico on March 29. This complaint sets itself apart from many of the others in that it asserts a failure to abide b

The CWA Blog is Retiring in June

Thirty-three years of practicing law is enough, and I'm retiring this year. Unfortunately, that also means the end of the CWA Blog. I've decided, after careful consideration, to send the Blog off into

Sackett Update

You will recall that the latest chapter of the long Sackett saga is that EPA filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot given that the old WOTUS rule, which is the basis of the Sackett challenge, is

© 2016 by Ryan & Kuehler PLLC.

  • Facebook Basic Black
  • LinkedIn Basic Black
  • Twitter Basic Black