Search
  • Mark Ryan

Two New Cases Underlining that Procedure Matters

Jarose v. County of Humbolt, 2020 WL 999791 (N.D. Cal. 2020) (denying motion to amend complaint in case involving unauthorized discharge of sump water to bay, held that plaintiff failed to exercise due diligence in discovering facts that it argues should allow it to add new parties to the litigation)


Back Bay Restoration Foundation, Ltd. V. USACOE, 2020 WL 1068629 (E.D. Va. 2019) (granting Corp’s motion for summary judgment, held that Corps properly determined there were no practical alternatives to the applicant’s preferred housing project location; applicant took steps to limit the project’s effect on WOTUS; Corps properly complied with its public review obligations; extra-record evidence in plaintiff’s affidavit struck; plaintiff waived right to bring up new arguments not preserved during public comment period)

21 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Waterkeeper Files NOI in Coal Ash Case

Waterkeeper last week served the NOI below on Ameren Corp, which is an electric utility in Missouri. The NOI alleges that Ameren is discharging without a permit wastewater from coal ash ponds into the

Two New (Oddball) CWA Cases

These two cases bring up issues one seldom sees in the case law, which makes them mildly interesting. Reading the clever arguments raised by defendants in the Earth Island case below reminded me of my

A Modest Proposal to Fix WOTUS

As I have argued numerous times in the past, Congress needs to fix the WOTUS problem. They created it by so vaguely defining “navigable waters,” and only they can permanently fix the problem (assuming

© 2016 by Ryan & Kuehler PLLC.

  • Facebook Basic Black
  • LinkedIn Basic Black
  • Twitter Basic Black