• Mark Ryan

Two New CWA Cases

In the Kovach case below, the pro se plaintiff sought a damage award of $264,350,000. He didn't get it.

South Side Quarry, LLC v. Metro. Sewer Dist., 2020 WL 3977659 (W.D. Kt. 2020) (on motion to dismiss in case involving discharges of stormwater and possibly CSO discharges into privately-owned gravel pit in violation of easement, held that plaintiff failed to properly disclose violations in 60-day notice and other claims were time barred)

Kovach v. United States, 2020 WL 4003366 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) (on motion to dismiss, held that pro se plaintiff, who suffered personal injuries as a result of a 1990 spill at an Air National Guard base, had no standing to sue because he could not obtain relief under the CWA; there is no private right of action under the CWA; all penalties must be paid to the U.S. Treasury; court rejected plaintiff’s argument that the court could redirect some of the penalty money from the Treasury to him)

If you would like to receive email notifications of new blogposts, go to the signup button above, leave your email, and you'll be alerted to updates.

38 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

New 2020 WOTUS Rule Challenge Filed

Two New Mexico tribes filed a new challenge to the 2020 WOTUS rule in the D. of New Mexico on March 29. This complaint sets itself apart from many of the others in that it asserts a failure to abide b

The CWA Blog is Retiring in June

Thirty-three years of practicing law is enough, and I'm retiring this year. Unfortunately, that also means the end of the CWA Blog. I've decided, after careful consideration, to send the Blog off into

Sackett Update

You will recall that the latest chapter of the long Sackett saga is that EPA filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot given that the old WOTUS rule, which is the basis of the Sackett challenge, is

© 2016 by Ryan & Kuehler PLLC.

  • Facebook Basic Black
  • LinkedIn Basic Black
  • Twitter Basic Black