• Mark Ryan

Two New CWA Cases - attorneys fees and WOTUS

It's somewhat unusual to see an award of attorney fees to defendants in a citizen suit case.

City of Highland Park v. EPA, 2020 WL 4569557 (E.D. Mich. 2020) (granting motion for attorney fees to defendants where court found that alleged CWA violations were “baseless” and “completely groundless and frivolous,” and were the subject of a motion for reconsideration and an appeal to the 6th Cir.; court stayed award of fees pending better documentation from defendants)

Lewis v. USACOE, 2020 WL 4495473 (M.D. La. 2020) (denying motion for summary judgment on whether Corps had jurisdiction to issue cease and desist order for tree removal related to development around ditch system, held that because the Corps had not developed an administrative record, there was nothing for the court to review under the APA and plaintiffs factual allegations in the complaint and supporting affidavits were not enough; claims that ditches at issue are not WOTUS could not be reviewed absent a record)

If you would like to receive email notifications of new blogposts, go to the signup button above, leave your email, and you'll be alerted to updates.

46 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

A Special Treat

In my April 12 blogpost, I explained that I would be retiring soon, and with retirement I would be retiring the CWA Blog at the end of May. In that post, I referenced a special treat for my readers. A

Six New Cases

We have three Circuit Court cases this round, which is unusual. None are earth-shaking, but the Rio Hondo case is worth a read if TMDL/anti-backsliding/WQ permit limits are your thing. The Center for

Enviro Groups Sue the Corps Over Pipelines

A number of environmental groups have sued the Corps over NWP 12, alleging that the modifications to the NWP failed to properly analyze environmental impacts of pipelines. The NWP modifications pushed