• Mark Ryan

Two New Wetlands Cases

Here are two new wetlands cases from the past week. The Brace case has been around for years.

South Carolina Coastal Conserv. League v. USACOE, 2020 WL 858599 (D. S.C. 2020) (largely denying motion to supplement the administrative record in case challenging Corps 404 permit for highway project, held that plaintiff has not carried the burden of presenting clear evidence that the compiled administrative record is incomplete)

United States v. Brace, 2020 WL 956460 (W.D. Pa. 2020) (ruling on the remedy after liability was earlier determined, held that defendant was to hire a qualified wetlands expert to develop a restoration plan to restore the site consistent with the outline provided by the government’s expert; defendant is ordered to place a deed restriction on the site to prevent future development; civil penalties are mandatory under the CWA for violations such as these; penalty deferred to a later date)

25 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

A Special Treat

In my April 12 blogpost, I explained that I would be retiring soon, and with retirement I would be retiring the CWA Blog at the end of May. In that post, I referenced a special treat for my readers. A

Six New Cases

We have three Circuit Court cases this round, which is unusual. None are earth-shaking, but the Rio Hondo case is worth a read if TMDL/anti-backsliding/WQ permit limits are your thing. The Center for

Enviro Groups Sue the Corps Over Pipelines

A number of environmental groups have sued the Corps over NWP 12, alleging that the modifications to the NWP failed to properly analyze environmental impacts of pipelines. The NWP modifications pushed